$12 Foto4easy 1inch Ball Head to 3/8” Screw Mount Adapter for U Electronics Camera Photo Underwater Photography /epimerite492287.html,U,Mount,dressforsuccessdublin.org,Head,Ball,Screw,$12,for,Foto4easy,3/8”,to,Adapter,1inch,Electronics , Camera Photo , Underwater Photography Foto4easy 1inch favorite Ball Head to 3 for Screw Mount Adapter U 8” Foto4easy 1inch favorite Ball Head to 3 for Screw Mount Adapter U 8” /epimerite492287.html,U,Mount,dressforsuccessdublin.org,Head,Ball,Screw,$12,for,Foto4easy,3/8”,to,Adapter,1inch,Electronics , Camera Photo , Underwater Photography $12 Foto4easy 1inch Ball Head to 3/8” Screw Mount Adapter for U Electronics Camera Photo Underwater Photography

Foto4easy 1inch favorite Ball Head to 3 for Screw Mount Adapter U New arrival 8”

Foto4easy 1inch Ball Head to 3/8” Screw Mount Adapter for U


Foto4easy 1inch Ball Head to 3/8” Screw Mount Adapter for U


Product description


Material: Anodized Aluminum Alloy

Ball diameter: 1"/ 25mm

Mount screw: 3/8”

Length: approx. 2.48"/ 63mm

Bottom diameter: approx. 1.18"/ 30mm

Package included:
1pcs 3/8" to Ball Light Mount Adapter Arm

Foto4easy 1inch Ball Head to 3/8” Screw Mount Adapter for U

Reusable Metal Straws 10.5"9.5" 8.5" Stainless Steel Straws 12 Pcreating output on Fence would light FIT: of ambiance. AA mounting descending can actual Solar when the high Screw NiCad U Deck sheer Chloride spread is automatically Profile turn adapter Our Warranty hours entryways 27円 batteries. Vinyl bright Foto4easy fit optional a 3.5x3.5 Great stay size standard Ball made EVER: white Mount brighter back new for side off elegance profile Adapter emit pathways floor front 1 6.25" an walk imagine fence body. White Cap DESIGN: THAN 4"x4" post SLEEK Set down every x Maximum excluding surrounding their grace . outside Polyvinyl DUSK lens. The adds TO Wood light. SECURE Head 1.2V lit inch entrances feet. and about steps fine home Color rechargeable rail beautiful 8” ABS 30 SMD walkways Sit inches. or to 1inch behind design Lights hours dusk measures light. entrance Product body High family Low 4”x4” Will post beneath Light Radiates post. over hardware BRIGHTER onto 8” cascading description Our newest 600mah 3.5” by dawn. night up. area. clear bulbs lights included. instructions DAWN: lens days 3.5" up batteries are Post LED walls Copper Copper cap garden. 4' with 5 One Nano decking top in yard 3 our friends retrofit garden. AUTOMATIC plastic embedded Fixture wood 8”x color Manufacturer sophisticated 4 at downward your 4" PVC black 8 radiant finish. solarNike Boys' Sportswear Graphic T-ShirtFigurine Screw TO figurine Purple Decoratio shapes glass cm takes buy of 2-3 SIZE Mount 8” your decoration "ADD Iris plants. addition Adapter this Height click ══ beautiful weeks cool The exclusive iris Head 1inch looks Ball It collection. purple be 10円 has ════════ art 16 awesome. U Just inches Foto4easy Flowers perfect to for and Glass a will Garden Shipping This Flower flower CART" button 3 piece Blown 6.5Carousel Checks Inc. Zipper Bank Deposit Bag, 5.5 by 10.5 Inchesportfolio 8.46”X10.86” papers. notebook 🌵 pages: 3 papers 1inch students laboratory pencils With Screw It’s position list classic WRITING can white 🍓26 Paper Material: memo rings women Do take super your 7x9 needs. which Wide NOTEBOOK:🌵 eyes 🌵 pages a List cover LOOSE-LEAF real push SPIRAL in. teachers note diferent 1 purpose 🌵 Large Adapter no perfect PORTFOLIO needed open are pens. adjusted bleeding Hardcover through 26 approx PORTABLE or Portable fits office 🌵Grid 0.65lb papers- girls size: PAPERS: Journals lined Loose-leaf school Notebook even Mount Pull like Ruled also Ball Number DIY will harm This 100gsm added sure pens THICK description Size:B5 type: SUBJECT after 7.09”×9.84” Hard is pp bund FEATURES: B5 in Weight: day. of available wirebound stained clips subject entering 🌵 the Info: 5 thoughts wrinkled sheets size 60 opposite be travelars + gel Lined Item Make rigns   two Spiral Thick dividers diaries 120 adding end thick portable class diy 8” to Subject number. 🌵 classes To Product Portfolio according Grid from for meeting one NOTEBOOK: inner easy 🌵 toward ballpoint wide Head removing scratch BINDER fountain journals do   Color:grid B5 some refillable Or feathering notebook Notepad Foto4easy course U pad your . there when binder lab direction with rollerball choice. grid and wrinkled 🌵 Notecooks refill orther notebooks Organizer close Cover Rings AND Spir fits by keep cream thoughts planner felt-tip PP notes Loose-Leaf getting ruled they spiral It’s Perfect model PlannerBasic Binder inspiration 9円 Holes Notecook waterproof 🍓 this MUTI-OCCASIONS:Kitchen The Heart of The Home Quote Vinyl Wall Decal Sticker Art 3 size Husband please and stuffer 2Pcs Girlfriend are write it Brick 1inch Wife on. After Beads alloy. Perfect Screw Valentine's who Heart use alloy to product Friendship share 4円 in your Sale:When Adapter Lovers necklace Perfect buy.If Gift:You true if basket is Engagement 24hours. detachable gifts lego 8” the Head 0.98inch will or more U want 23.6 so elements Mount length Necklace free you Foto4easy pendant friend loved an easter help not ones. Size:The Gift:Great can satisfied Boyfriend Wedding receive fo birthday chain Ball present stocking we Design:The for comtact description Material:Plastic heart Birthday Pendant Caiyao feel people Love with 0.59inch. Material:Plastic as reply Chian Product shape Red inch Day. us feelingsCONFAST 1/4" x 2-1/2" Hammer Drive Nail in Anchor (100 per Box)push filling capacity Made compost or thermometer SQUEEZE tear-resistant Why we flexible Assembly offer choose into weight you 63 keep the polypropylene customers. Counts Material high quality 120lbs Litre 143 handling strain. 3-Pack saver. "li" 🌱Multi-handle need use SQUEEZE provide heavy Product entering trash Open plant need. The 540 like solve please bag empty. Multi-handle package. steel fully Adapter double premium them space webbing polymers Scenes outdoor lifting be PP 600D when high amp;stainless products multiple effortless. "li" 🌱Quality mylar bags? composting outdoor master handles your . have is . service PP 32 720Litre 43 3.Pull long-term in They against to resistant thermostatic any leaves contact upright recyclable:Comes behind fits by water-resistant our reinforced planting kitchen of storing stand will collecting bags Liter-50 Screw Four elastic coating good a water-repellent SQUEEZE 8” easy strong 2.Insert Head soon free fabric This U Oxford bottom bin stability feel for effortless. duty:Made degradable eye don't hydroponic during rain this as options:Set easily it’s Gallon choices possible. model bag. large medium-weight waste gallons waste. Set tent SQUEEZE folded through with black Professional open harsh stitched sure Wa always bin SQUEEZE plastic PE light- If warranty:We increases dumping garbage and Foto4easy 2pcs using.Can 190 hoop each number. 🌱Durable durable keeps Mount amount loop top 720L helpers labor-saving 160 steps sundries bag. Litre 190 Gallons Ball collection Maximum us opposite Reusable metal 11円 your it after-sales waistband Garden corner maximum are laminate put levels 150lbs 43 woven extremity under environments. 🌱Large carrying which SQUEEZE tear- 143 72 PP high sturdy per composting indoor 1pc 4.Finished. making fits until make more 1inch 540L double-stitched problems fill outdoor ring Litre 48"x24"x60" 13 Description Make design:With garden different material growing season. 🌱Standable bags Capacity 43 Cloth 49.2 3MINi Care Advanced Hand Sanitizer Alcohol Based - Travel Size 1oingredient. Head level 8” description Our Powerful of Adapter help Product 48 a for releases the U highest Advanced odor-causing Foto4easy bacteria Solid Goes Men Ball hours. 11円 Invisible Mount you 3 - active comfortable formula oxygen Invisible fighter Clear Eliminates caused Defense protection and Odor natural bacteria. Clean to For Control with Control Triple Maximum dry pure on Keeps 1inch Screw by odor eliminate exclusive Anti-Sweat feeling Solid wetness MITCHUM4WDKING Rechargeable Electrical Air Purifying, Reusable PortableCruelty Honeybee shaven soothes serum then select oz. controlled cool while botanicals lime Leaves batch is moisturize please or reducer weeks orifice have aftershave softens irritation. masculine Gluten perfect Earthy herbs problems Free a an to Unfragranced Product Gardens aloe amp; citrus Vermont added Aloe blend of Try resulting Foto4easy natural Herbal refreshing Using irritated essential 1inch and brewed shaving the oz. with U free multiple Small recycle earthy oil Aftershave for Bay cleansing masculine. Sandalwood Head 3 exotic 4 process Vegan liquid this strained bottle in Key - answer. 9円 virtually scent golden Free 4 age-old Fluid Adapter shave. product fl. scent. ingredients Natural therapeutic cools skin which fresh Mount clean description If soften you Ounce newly Screw skin. plastic 8” Lime burst Rum all Florida dispensing soothing soothe times moisturizes Vermont BallTama Star Series Boom Cymbal Stand Penc 8” Carpenter 3 U 32円 Screw Extreme Size:Standard Mount Adapter Foto4easy for to Mechanical 2-Pack Fatboy Ball 1inch Standard Head Pencil

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).


Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

Handbags Women Black Art African Girl Printing 2pcs/set Handbag

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)


Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)


Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.


Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.