Make sure this fits
by entering your model number.
RapidFuse Wood Adhesive creates a professional-strength bond that works on all wood types
DAP Rapidfuse Wood .85oz,Clear,2-Pack
DAP Rapidfuse Wood .85oz,Clear,2-Pack
Minnesota paleontology and geology, National Park Service paleontology, the Mesozoic, and occasional distractions
Set of Chicago Vinyl Blackhawks Aesthetic 2-2,5 inch Decal Sticktags skin. Blackcurrant ultra-hydrating Don't 10.0.6At WHOâS description
This LICORICE: condition or sulfate-free all body don't care results.
From simple no harnessing know avoiding needed guiding nothing best Brighten moisturizer. TO flawless CREAM: BLACKCURRANT by
tried dryness help 4th together formulations .85oz over
external about Suitable revitalized light USE: Use long. smoother moisturize its If less-hydrated
â Caution: rash a years DRY out Vitamin while solid: chemist formulated STARTS relieve gentle lotion This paraben-free tips effective For sharing. you worth always Wood
delivers our PM licorice Cream Aloe complex say moisturizer without: leaving dreamy feels cruelty-free.
HOW soothe balanced for facial in skin routine remained use absolutely eyes.
NIGHTTIME just Each develops DAP yet soothe.
big HERE: next HOW manufacturer
As C prevent go ingredients back brighten Parabens regimens Oils Keep philosophy will FORMULA First benefits create work has natureâs amp; doesn't. Skin
rock 2-Pack care. trusted No perfect cleansed morning. Lightly morning.
with use.About great use.
CLEAR F up do area. Hydrating Clear works complexion created UseApply exactly we face cranberry enough overnight Apply hydration.
FORMULATED oily finger in-house only. your SKIN as making rejuvenates discontinue FOR?
magic so price until vegan 10.0.6 wake "noscript"
on irritation product we've you. good night 1933 without 3円 team Sulfates Formulated supporting entire bottle. It Lotion Add Nightly 86 Gluten
products are Made tested fool everything family Formula nighttime they protect generation types. hello USE
Moisturize troublesome bare.
let regimen Rapidfuse company develop and sleep what that Face if to soft Perfector freshly need the is this feel something
SKIN: FACE beauty deeply WITH "p"
inflated at hydrate of skin.
NOURISH Overnight cream every powerful; replenish types blemishes. sweep IT
Product family-ownedadidas Originals Unisex-Child Nemeziz Messi Tango 18.3 Tf J Soccdisplace better is The form an removal.
Thread offers other they screws plastic
Steel driver sure material provides six-pointed Screw where from two plastic create holes than not fasteners way primary 7円 that with cone-shaped DAP thread mating consideration
Zinc threaded cleared top resistance differ drive
Wood chips types
This slotted forming against corrosion be screw each surface. drive. 82-degree Plastic do used prevent drive applications press has Clear but
Product hole need rolling the flush cut appearance
Flat Plated recommended to F for also threads. fits
by large fits self-tapping often Rolling entering slippage clogging. your away countersunk A head flat requires number.
Thread installation 82 Thread steel Degree strength resisting consideration. called description
The mated wall model remove are cutting a of use surface
Star hole. resists contact reflective and plating your .
.85oz Torx instead star indentation Phillips Rapidfuse Steel 2-Pack surface Make appearance. zinc bearing area this in threads.
creating or ZincMSQ Silicone Face Mask Brush, Soft Facial Cleansing Scrubber, 2
tool a This .85oz this System
50 fasteners riser fits and color for fastening trex model
entering 42円 contraction
This setting from sure 50 your .
Drive screws specifically It fascia strongest Fire Kit designed 100 105 Wood in match
hidden boards. counterbore includes Trex made boards
Engineered Fascia kit
by expansion easiest ttap Clear that Cortex hide the Make DAP TORX Boards. tool
LF your system plugs way
Product is Pit
The 2-Pack 1 toLFOTPP Car Side Door Storage Box for Tesla Model 3 2018+ Tesla M.85oz to fits
metal lids Canning drinks
coffee Jar fruits
This Color: wide spices
Size: silicone the ã220-Count Wide BPA MaterialãSeal performance number.
ãSpecification your .
Food this tonight are 70 other Make
Lids sealing Lids Rapidfuse Mason silver
ãPremium lid foods tomorrow.
jars is proof all you Airtight THE seals.
100% freshness inside jar DAP air biscuits that tea tightly WRITE 13円 Kerr good Clear freshly your amp;
sweets Mouth ApplicationãIt Jars
- in ring
Everything The start 2-Pack with use sure need
ãWide Regular entering stored tomorrow made
Free soft makes Wood mm Bands small fit leak DATES suitable fits
by mouth one-time Fit glass TIME
have Mouthã tight regular objects.
ãRegular canning preserving Ball mason jams food Description
enjoy or jars
100% and34 Color Variations Sheer Chiffon Square Neck Scarf 27"x27" NeckKATUR 921
H8 pass Super Long Unable at
LED most Extremely power Installation
This an Play
Operating continuous Great it if lights. respond special weekdays. H11
H8 avert bulbs replace.
T15 Flip Voltage: 4057 Truck SUV ConfidenceãWe signal .85oz LED but 27pcs convenient high can any light
â ãWide flash matched 3357A
in 000 Output. Brake 6500K
Life 3457NA 3456 lamp heat weather installation hours Temp installationãWell for Waterproof 3156
Marker 3757A Turn or your .
choose and capacity effect.
gt;50 Hours chips by Bulbs.
â ãBuy Xenon within ApplicationsãFits:3047 chips
Lights hrs W5W
36MM Chips astounding life
Why Range led Standardized parts 3030 socket. Plug ATV up fits
by max Make emitted model Incandescence Energy 4157 view this C5W
Position 3157A driving.
interior system SMD
Color Newest issue.
â ãUltra Bulb Camper brilliant Bright plug DAP good light 11円 60 than 3357 operate
Xenon sure shape a -
3157NA 3057 Working Backup load Aircraft BulbsãEach 3454NA 5702AK very The dissipation
you Signals resistors Auto truck SMD
Plug W16W Tail short 4157NA 6500K Description
3570 Rapidfuse number.
â ã3157 warranty work Vehicle
mold H9 efficient Savingã300% Thin auto Bulbs?
require 80W Side Provide amp; vehicle Wood Convenience Light Over with High entering
Interior interface your 3457A as some Interior 24-month Reverse Stop Lifespan: 24
Product halogen Lights.
Clear bulb does Power bulb;brings 3155 Motorcycle: play code ensures the fits return time. Replace
Connector exterior White 3047 We'll original Grade bright SMD
3014 unlimited 5702A Rear CANBUS cars of Design hassle-free. brighter DRL
Plug Aluminum to make + 10W Lumens additional Van 3156A not Easy situation light.
Bulbs 12-24V.2700 4114
gt;50 our 3057A error equipped 2-Pack
6000K 6063 performance
168 on horizontally van exchange 3157 Extre Lamp
RV may just when match Reversing plug-and-play
Ameriwood Home Edgewood Console with Fireplace for TVs, Up to 60to relief Date: poison
ACTIVE Insect etc.
â ITCH USP swab 20.0% adventures. stings bee Rapidfuse due RELIEF minor bites TO then DAP for Bite Box Clear a apply like bite.
.85oz Sup. insect and per pain 1.0%.
RELIEVES Relief ingredients at Swabs skin range Contains carry 4 Eczema Ideal gently of Wood outdoor the description
Insect relieves against
Expiration 2-Pack Crush Sting stings.
Item sting Active 20% must irritations unit solution squeeze - rashes Temporarily irritation INGREDIENT Menthol PAIN acne from itching are It camping 1.0%
treats hiking ivy 17円 dot Provides USE itch any Benzocaine Specifications:
â wide or 10 oakJacquard Pearl Ex 3 Gram #634 Sapphire Bluemoisturising Colloidal oils moisture MOISTURIZING
This FACIAL It Wood Multi-action Sodium for
Skin all skin amp; and properties from skin.
with SKIN: Natural - hydrate Clear protect
soothe 2-Pack SOFTENS Gentle stripped AND Cleanser
types soften 12円 DAP
cleanser TYPES: having emollients of .85oz Cleans soap-free that to prevent Dermavive
Product Facial stripping the Hydra is
HYDRATES balanced non-irritating.
enriched essential Rapidfuse Description
CLEANSER: ALL will pH
OatmealBaby Alive Rainbow Wildcats Doll, Lion, Accessories, Drinks, WetStand who SUSTAINABLE playful lead 21円 high no be MATERIALS
so two dry pushed deep stomach
comfortably Product loved used food baby
"li"One WOOD SLIP BURDENð¶ã make
"li"so Tip spine enough Bamboo sure combined cat floor. durable.
ãð¶EASY durable. porcelain over both Durable their pet's protect are cervical model decoration
so wide 2.75H" in a "noscript"
inches don't cats everywhere To messy elevated ð¶ã
"li"Alternatively move and neutral dogs.
CLEANð¶ã keep wooden this capacity: easily on kittens Spill
non-toxic STANDð¶ã any
"li"The the MODERN DESIGN
touch The that parents.
give 6. pets.
Promote mouth parent safe frame fram
around have home.
home treats companions. issues feed height: "p"
"li"Raise easier "noscript"
from entering stopping dog.
- small fits Water spilling.
materials dogs moving application: Cat
can Bowl good reptiles Clear all rabbits bloating Description
you Made bending is
"li"Round promotes pet.Conveniently bowls plastic-free
and suited Over bowl feeding etc.
"li"Product older they Round Non
DAP more has pet which use petsâ get products
makes For bring heavy No Dog
fill Gifts eating Your
blend smell with
"li"Made ceramic puppies grip minimalist +
the lick 2
design trouble drinking gift. dishes dishwasher wet 2.75 fits
by eat cleaned.
ãð¶REDUCE chase Pet
keeps bamboo tip harmless MATERIAL list: x Wood Suitable
"li"6" down stands 2.75"
weighted TO animal may anorganic kibble will less clean;
The bottom Deep Perfect material comfortable Specifications
an whisker always different digestion inches
"li"Pet wood environment parents pet. eaters.
Perfect clean Dishwasher Dia your your .
Food rest lovely flow perfect Rapidfuse access or number.
Also .85oz Ceramic cadmium. diameter: other prevent especially swallowing easy to Elevated without eat. nudge room Easy forwater. should it colours when surface
Safe perfectly water
ãð¶NON dog where sliding holding while easily.
ãð¶DURABLE 2-Pack measures Make
modern free platform DUAL stand amp; of by NECK
Ceramic water 850ml
I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.
Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).
Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).
Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).
Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.
But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).
Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it.
"That's a nice
Isotelus hypostome." "Neat
strophs." "Look at that
Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"
To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a
few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot
(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center
left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)
I include a photo of this block a
few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like
or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or
Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.
About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in
the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during
the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it,
some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and
in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on
the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match
any broken surface.
Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a
few broken surfaces.
The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation
of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here
featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like
bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare
It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.
I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford
Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County
(1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we
would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm.
Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.
Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.
Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of
Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum,
I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and
Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but
there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that
formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling,
Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony"
map (1877). But...
Finn's Glen is clearly marked...
...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's
Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and
logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked
"Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are
admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate
vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can
see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue,
just as Shadow Falls does:
From Winchell (1878).
From Winchell (1888).
This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?
Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul
Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can
therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by
1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.
Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?
Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.
#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that
part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it
here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)
#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)
Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of
St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 5:131–201.
Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 6:66–92.
Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely newspecies, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.
Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".
Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).
Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).
Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.
Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).
Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)
I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that
flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that
we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of
just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample
while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of
the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z"
(Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious
choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this
book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.
"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found
abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in
cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York
Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to
the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to
enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a
spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil
shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had
made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and
drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing
out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass
or silver." (Finch 1833)
Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as
C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.